Pandemic Muzzling of the Public
Everyone knows that the COVID-19 pandemic has changed our lives, at least temporarily. This includes how we, the public, participate in local politics. With the pandemic-induced changes to how local politics works, I am a little concerned about the health of public participation in local politics during these unusual times. Let’s take a look at why I believe our voices are not being heard as well now.
Ordinarily, we can all participate in any public meeting by simply attending. In most cases, signing in and standing to address a board during community input is standard practice. And in our open, democratic society, our words become part of the public record.
Since the closing of City Hall to the public two months ago, how does public input work now? The Board of Aldermen voted to only accept, not read, emails and placed them on file for all remote meetings. The Board’s pandemic position to acknowledge the email is a far cry from physical participation in a public meeting where press coverage and media viewership brings light to citizen comments.
The Board has adopted an even more interesting practice. A citizen’s email communication for public input must be receive one week prior to the Board meeting, otherwise it is tabled until the next meeting, two weeks down the road. At a minimum, the Board should be making these emails available in a much timelier manner.
The Boards new rules on public comment is a strong indication of how muted our voices have become in city government. Ordinarily, the Board would provide up to 30 minutes for public comment; they have been running freely without any “interference” from the public.
On the other hand, board committees or city managers has the ability to submit reports to the board and have them immediately recognized on record. President Wilshire simply suspends the rule, if there is no objection of the Board, and accepts into record the correspondence submitted (BOA Youtube 4/28/2020 at 16 min) . The Board is using The Mason Rules for Legislative Procedure to muzzle the public, rather than to keep order so all voices can be heard.
Aldermen Jette and Alderwoman Lu have questioned why public emails are not be recognized in meetings (Jette Budget Committee Minutes 4/20/20, page 4/Lu BOA Youtube 5/12/20 at 50:00 min). They are silenced by other Aldermen who are trying to train them in “the Nashua Way”. Push the public off and stiffle them.
From my vantage point, Nashua’s politicians are using the dictum “never let a good crisis go to waste” to exploit and advance their own political agendas. More so than ever, it is an important time for the public to keep a watchful eye.